Introduction
- The Basic Structure Doctrine is a judicial principle that prevents amendments that can alter the fundamental essence of the Indian Constitution.
- It ensures the Constitution’s supremacy and safeguards its core principles from arbitrary changes.
- This doctrine was established by the Supreme Court of India in the landmark Kesavananda Bharati case (1973).
Origin of the Doctrine
- First hinted at in the Sajjan Singh case (1965), where some judges expressed concern over the unchecked power of constitutional amendments.
- Further deliberated in the Golaknath case (1967), where the Supreme Court ruled that Fundamental Rights cannot be amended by Parliament.
- In the Kesavananda Bharati case, the doctrine was formally established to strike a balance between amendability and protecting the Constitution's essence.
Kesavananda Bharati Case (1973)
- A 13-judge bench of the Supreme Court delivered the judgment on April 24, 1973.
- The Court ruled that while Parliament has the power to amend the Constitution under Article 368, it cannot alter its basic structure.
- The judgment overruled the earlier Golaknath decision but introduced the concept of basic structure as a limitation.
- Highlighted components of the basic structure include:
- Sovereignty, democracy, and republican form of government.
- Secularism and federalism.
- Separation of powers and judicial independence.
Components of the Basic Structure
- The basic structure doctrine has been elaborated upon in subsequent cases, identifying various elements:
- Sovereignty and Integrity of India.
- The Preamble as the guiding principle of the Constitution.
- Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles of State Policy.
- Judicial review and the rule of law.
- Free and fair elections.
- These elements ensure that the spirit of the Constitution remains intact.
Significant Judgments
- Indira Gandhi vs. Raj Narain (1975): The Supreme Court invalidated the 39th Amendment, reinforcing the doctrine.
- Minerva Mills case (1980): Declared that limited amending power itself is part of the basic structure.
- S.R. Bommai case (1994): Strengthened the principles of federalism and secularism as elements of the basic structure.
- I.R. Coelho case (2007): Stated that laws placed under the Ninth Schedule are subject to judicial review if they violate the basic structure.
Significance of the Doctrine
- Protects the sanctity of the Constitution against arbitrary amendments.
- Maintains a balance between the legislative, executive, and judiciary.
- Ensures that the fundamental rights of citizens are safeguarded.
- Prevents the misuse of Article 368 for political or authoritarian objectives.
Criticism of the Doctrine
- Criticized for being vague and lacking clear definition.
- Some view it as an overreach of judicial authority, limiting the power of the legislature.
- Leads to debates on the scope and applicability of the doctrine in specific cases.
Conclusion
The Basic Structure Doctrine is a cornerstone of constitutional law in India, ensuring that the Constitution remains a living document that adapts to changing times while preserving its core values. It reflects the principle of constitutionalism, where no authority, including Parliament, is above the Constitution.