1. Overview
- The independence of the judiciary is a cornerstone of Indian democracy, ensuring fair and impartial justice.
- It guarantees that the judiciary operates free from the influence of the executive, legislature, and any external pressures.
- This principle is critical to maintaining the rule of law and protecting fundamental rights.
2. Constitutional Provisions
- Articles 124–147 in the Constitution deal with the organization and independence of the judiciary.
- The Supreme Court and High Courts are established as independent constitutional bodies.
- Article 50 directs the state to separate the judiciary from the executive in public services.
- Judges are appointed through a detailed process involving the President, judiciary, and executive to ensure fairness.
3. Appointment of Judges
- The appointment of judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts follows the collegium system, emphasizing judicial independence.
- The executive's role is limited, reducing the possibility of external interference.
- The judges are selected based on merit, seniority, and integrity, maintaining transparency and neutrality.
4. Tenure and Security
- Supreme Court judges have a tenure until the age of 65 years, while High Court judges serve until 62 years.
- They can only be removed through impeachment by Parliament for proven misconduct or incapacity, ensuring job security.
- This safeguards judges from arbitrary removal, ensuring independent decision-making.
5. Financial Independence
- The judiciary has a separate budget, and judges' salaries, allowances, and pensions are charged on the Consolidated Fund of India.
- Parliament cannot alter the salaries and conditions of service of judges to their disadvantage during their tenure.
6. Prohibition on Practice
- After retirement, Supreme Court and High Court judges are barred from practicing in any court of law to avoid conflicts of interest.
- This ensures that judges' decisions remain impartial and free from external obligations.
7. Judicial Review
- The judiciary has the power of judicial review, enabling it to declare any law or executive action unconstitutional if it violates the Constitution.
- This mechanism strengthens judicial independence by allowing it to act as the guardian of the Constitution.
8. Contempt of Court
- The judiciary is empowered to act against any individual or entity for contempt of court, ensuring respect for judicial authority.
- This provision reinforces its dignity and autonomy.
9. Challenges to Judicial Independence
- Instances of judicial overreach and delays in judicial appointments sometimes raise questions about independence.
- The increasing workload and backlog of cases can hinder the judiciary's ability to function independently and effectively.
- Concerns about the opaque nature of the collegium system have been raised, demanding judicial reforms.
10. Importance
- Judicial independence ensures equality before the law and protection of fundamental rights.
- It acts as a check on arbitrary actions by the executive and legislature.
- It maintains public confidence in the judicial system as a neutral arbiter.
Conclusion
The independence of the judiciary is essential for upholding the principles of democracy and the rule of law. While challenges exist, maintaining and enhancing judicial independence is crucial for the effective functioning of India’s legal system.