Skip to main content
Recent Landmark Judgments
- Kesavananda Bharati Case (1973): Established the Basic Structure Doctrine, preventing Parliament from altering the Constitution’s fundamental framework.
- Right to Privacy (Puttaswamy Case, 2017): Declared privacy as a fundamental right under Article 21.
- Triple Talaq Case (Shayara Bano, 2017): Declared instant triple talaq unconstitutional, leading to legislative reforms.
- Section 377 Case (Navtej Johar, 2018): Decriminalized consensual homosexual acts between adults.
- Sabarimala Case (2018): Allowed the entry of women of all ages into the Sabarimala temple, citing gender equality.
Judgments on Governance
- State of Rajasthan v. Union of India (1977): Defined the role of the Governor during a political crisis.
- Arunachal Pradesh Case (2016): Reiterated the necessity of following constitutional procedures for dismissing a government under Article 356.
- Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015): Struck down Section 66A of the IT Act as unconstitutional, emphasizing freedom of speech.
- Adhaar Case (2018): Upheld the constitutional validity of Aadhaar while restricting its mandatory usage to certain services.
Judgments on Environmental Issues
- M.C. Mehta Cases: Multiple rulings on environmental protection, including the Taj Trapezium Zone and vehicular pollution control.
- National Green Tribunal Act Case: Affirmed the Tribunal's powers in environmental governance.
- Sterlite Industries Case (2019): Ordered closure of the Sterlite copper plant to protect environmental health.
Judgments on Social Justice
- Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma (2020): Recognized daughters as equal heirs under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956.
- Indra Sawhney Case (1992): Provided clarity on reservations, introducing the concept of the creamy layer in OBC reservations.
- EWS Reservation Case (2022): Upheld the 103rd Amendment, granting 10% reservation for Economically Weaker Sections.
- Judgment on Marital Rape (2022): Recognized marital rape as a valid ground for divorce under personal laws.
Judgments on Electoral Reforms
- People’s Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India (2003): Introduced the concept of the NOTA option in voting.
- Lily Thomas Case (2013): Struck down provisions allowing convicted legislators to remain in office.
- Voter ID and Aadhaar Link Case (2021): Highlighted concerns of privacy and potential exclusion in linking Aadhaar with voter IDs.
Judgments on Women's Rights
- Vishaka Guidelines (1997): Established guidelines to prevent sexual harassment in workplaces.
- Joseph Shine Case (2018): Struck down Section 497 of IPC, decriminalizing adultery.
- Hadiya Case (2017): Reaffirmed the right to marry as an aspect of personal liberty.
Significance of These Judgments
- Strengthened the values of justice, liberty, and equality.
- Reiterated the independence of the judiciary in protecting constitutional principles.
- Addressed critical societal and governance issues effectively.
- Provided clarity and direction on the implementation of laws and policies.
- Ensured the protection of fundamental rights and promoted accountability in governance.